dimanche 19 avril 2015

0

Some Interesting Information About Cars Carbon Footprint

  • dimanche 19 avril 2015
  • 00fees
  • Share
  • By Cornelius Nunev


    For good or ill, governments and a good cross portion of people want to diminish the "carbon footprint" or emissions of carbon dioxide, of human civilization. It's not so much that cars are not contributing, but some data about cars carbon footprint could be astonishing.

    Carbon footprint of dog as bad as car

    One of the most common things people look at on the subject of cutting down on their carbon footprint is their car. A number of people are working hard to cut back the carbon footprint of civilization.

    However, a study from New Zealand, according to AutoGuide, suggests the carbon footprint of a dog is roughly the same as that of a Toyota Landcruiser, Toyota's luxury full-size SUV with a 4.6-liter V-8.

    The study, by Robert and Brenda Vale, came to that conclusion by estimating the land usage for creating one year's worth of kibble, figuring the typical pooch consumes 3.17 ounces of meat and 5.5 ounces of grain per sitting. A one-year supply requires 2.07 acres of land to grow. By comparison, the energy generated by driving a Landcruiser 6,200 miles in one year generates 55.1 gigajoules of energy, equal to using 1.1 acres of land.

    Cat footprint

    Purchasing a dog will not cost you carloans, though buying a new Landcruiser will, but that does not mean anything about a carbon footprint. People generally drive 12,400 miles instead of the 6,200 figure Vales presented. The comparison was not quite accurate, but even with the higher number, the Landcruiser only produced a carbon footprint of 2.2 acres of land.

    They likewise found a cat had a carbon footprint roughly equivalent to a Volkswagen Golf.

    Edmunds found, using Environmental Protection Agency testing procedures that a Ford Raptor pickup, with a 411 horsepower, 6.2-liter V-8, emits less carbon dioxide, non-methane hydrocarbons and nitrous oxide, the main emissions looked at in automobiles, than gas-powered leaf blowers.

    The Echo two stroke leafblower and the Ryobi four-stroke leafblower are much worse than the Ryobi. The Ryobi had 13.5 times more nitrous oxide, 36 times more NMHC emissions and 6.8 times more carbon dioxide than the Raptor, and the two-stroke numbers were much worse than that.

    Why do we pick on automobiles?

    The New York Times explained that electric automobiles actually have big footprints too. Even though the carbon footprints are not terrible, they are about the same as a normal subcompact. The cars are powered through electricity, and 45 percent of the electricity in the nation is generated by coal still. That means some areas are really bad for electricity.

    There was a survey in 2011 by the Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership, according to AutoBlog, that showed it costs more emissions to produce electric vehicles. In fact, it costs 8 percent more carbon dioxide to make a hybrid car in contrast to a normal car. It is 12 percent more if the car is a plug-in hybrid and 23 percent more if the car is a complete electric car. You should not go to Nissan dealers, Everett, Washington to Miami, Florida, looking for electric automobiles to cut back your carbon footprint; you may not really be doing that.




    About the Author:



    0 Responses to “Some Interesting Information About Cars Carbon Footprint”

    Enregistrer un commentaire

    Trending

    Subscribe